Be A Doctor, 'Cause The Drugs Are Legal

It’s a strange thing in America. We’re expected, and driven, to be a sports fan for a lifetime.

A Packers fan myself, I can root for Brett Favre as a cybernetic organism in 2029 (and don’t think they ain’t working on exactly this over at ESPGeN) and not be thought of strangely.

But if I mention my love for Thin Lizzy when I’m 75, this will come my way:

“Why don’t you grow up?”

It’s normal “job” in Europe. A musician is an artist. Music is a vocation. A skill. Highly valued, especially in the live element. So, for a Euro-someone to mention that he or she is a fan of any given band at an advanced age is not a developmental detriment. They’re also allowed to cheer for West Ham United.

In Iron Maiden’s case, you can root for Eddie and the Hammers. Cheers! Aces High! Up the Irons!

But here, a musician is a miscreant. A loser that got lucky, even if he or she sold any of their craft. It’s the only job in the USA where being an addict is expected! And in some cases, encouraged. Can’t think of another one like it. If you poll psychologists about their own chemical joyriders, you’ll find a consistent ratio of them is addictive.

Bricklayers, pilots, sheriffs, etc…

But, their addictions would not be seen as immature. Or showy. Or a matter of course. Or fuel for career disdain. Those employees seek help, get offered help, forced to receive help. Help. Then, back on your horse as a recovering addict.

Musicians are expected to be on the horse, and that’s the wrong kind of horse. Drugs and their lure are tragic enough, but it’s tough trap to avoid. Touring is an environment where alcohol is currency (I cannot count the amount of times I got paid in beer - whether I wanted it or not.).

Addiction is as commonplace as yelling “1-2-3-4” before a song. Look what happened to Dee Dee, fer crying out loud.

Quick example - Was the late Amy Winehouse known for her talent or for the substance sideshow she became? Was her addictive behavior the show, or her music? And what if she was an athlete who was on your fave team? Would you think the same way about her?

Americans are expected to outgrow music and the musicians they love by age 30-ish. It’s seen as a pimply rite of passage. The “Love of Music” is something that is to be endured by elders as a phase, and fed by young ones as a cause. Then it’s over, like squeaky voices and bad manners. After all that immature riffing, real adulthood can begin.

And GOD FORBID a child wants to be one! “Good Lord, I’d rather have him on a rooftop with a loaded rifle than be in a band”, I heard one parent say. I gave her a quizzical look, and said “Yeah? A musician? Like me?”

Insert awkward stuttering here…

Part of the employment perception problem, I think (thanks for asking) is that musicians, whether they’re hobbyists or pros, begin the same way – in the garage or basement, hammering out a three chord song. Then they get two songs down; four, eight, 16, etc…

They play a party, they play a club, they get signed and they move up the performance ladder. Other musicians (famous or obscure) can all compare notes – they have the same job transit system. And there are no diplomas or sexy suffix letters after your name to enforce respect for your efforts.

Dentists don’t have that particular albatross. I've been at parties with DDS’s and they don’t all get psyched about a root canal, run out into the garage, fire up a chair and some nitrous, then drill away on a guest.

And if they do, I wanna go to that party. I’ll bet Slash will be there.

But, musicians can do that (with the nitrous, too). Bono can walk into a rehearsal studio in any city, and find something in common with the band that’s rehearsing there. They all look at each other; agree on a tune and the creative stripes all match.

It’s a valuable skill.

It’s communication at the most human level.

And it ought to be more valued here - at least as much as the Cyber Favre we have coming out of the stem cell huddle.

Maybe by 2029…